Birdwatch Note
2025-02-11 19:51:10 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
This claim is extremely misleading due to the nature of 1860 census data. Only 1% of individuals were listed as slaveholders, but 25% of households owned slaves. The misleading stat has been publicly fact-checked and corrected over the last several years. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/07/16/fact-check-social-media-post-underrepresents-slave-ownership-1860/7980243002/ https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2017/aug/24/viral-image/viral-post-gets-it-wrong-extent-slavery-1860/
Written by 8DF622A089C4F868C80C4EB14230607B4EFD76EFCEAC1177AC52DDA14D00F70B
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1889316525032575033
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1889401815419978008
- noteId - 1889401815419978008
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 8DF622A089C4F868C80C4EB14230607B4EFD76EFCEAC1177AC52DDA14D00F70B Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1739303470841
- tweetId - 1889316525032575033
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- This claim is extremely misleading due to the nature of 1860 census data. Only 1% of individuals were listed as slaveholders, but 25% of households owned slaves. The misleading stat has been publicly fact-checked and corrected over the last several years. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/07/16/fact-check-social-media-post-underrepresents-slave-ownership-1860/7980243002/ https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2017/aug/24/viral-image/viral-post-gets-it-wrong-extent-slavery-1860/
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2025-02-12 18:33:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-12 13:46:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-12 06:36:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-12 04:01:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-12 03:46:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-12 02:33:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 23:00:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 21:45:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 21:38:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 21:18:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 21:16:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 20:06:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 19:37:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 19:27:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 19:09:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 19:05:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 18:31:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 17:23:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 17:14:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 17:04:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 16:56:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 16:53:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 16:47:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 16:37:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 16:27:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 15:43:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 15:23:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 15:23:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 15:22:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 15:19:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 15:18:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 15:16:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 15:15:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 15:13:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 15:09:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 15:05:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 15:02:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 15:00:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 15:00:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 14:58:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 14:52:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 14:51:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 14:51:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 14:49:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 14:46:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 14:46:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 14:43:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 14:34:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 14:34:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 14:32:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 14:31:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 14:31:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 14:30:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 14:29:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 14:29:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 14:25:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 13:56:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 13:54:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-13 19:58:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 23:55:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 18:57:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 18:00:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 15:28:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 15:27:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 15:22:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 15:15:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 15:10:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 14:45:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 14:41:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 14:32:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 14:20:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 13:55:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-11 13:52:58 -0600 | Rating Details |