Birdwatch Note
2025-02-11 16:07:21 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN, the source used in the other note directly refutes the claim it is trying to make
Written by FBDF5E72411846E8D3352D4C1A2D4EB4178E9BEF2E86026180B8503DE9D45F0A
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1889103946435682727
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1889345486899089760
- noteId - 1889345486899089760
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - FBDF5E72411846E8D3352D4C1A2D4EB4178E9BEF2E86026180B8503DE9D45F0A Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1739290041075
- tweetId - 1889103946435682727
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN, the source used in the other note directly refutes the claim it is trying to make
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-02-11 13:37:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 13:15:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 13:10:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 11:47:56 -0600 | Rating Details |