Birdwatch Note
2025-02-11 02:30:31 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The Trump administration has offered no evidence that the condom claim is true, while the experts roundly say it is not. https://www.factcheck.org/2025/01/trump-administration-makes-unsupported-claim-about-50-million-for-condoms-to-gaza/ https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2025/01/29/politics/gaza-condoms-fact-check https://apnews.com/article/gaza-condoms-fact-check-trump-50-million-26884cac6c7097d7316ca50ca4145a82 https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20250129-aid-experts-dismiss-trump-s-gaza-condoms-spending-claim https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/01/29/gaza-condoms-fact-checker-trump/ https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/no-evidence-us-spent-50-million-condoms-gaza-2025-01-30/ https://www.dw.com/en/fact-check-trumps-team-targets-usaid-with-false-claims/a-71535712
Written by 6560F9C5B1A4759DC79D2686742E467F51857BEB91C3ED9630FBEE9736533367
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1889136361757897151
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1889139924252647875
- noteId - 1889139924252647875
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 6560F9C5B1A4759DC79D2686742E467F51857BEB91C3ED9630FBEE9736533367 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1739241031121
- tweetId - 1889136361757897151
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The Trump administration has offered no evidence that the condom claim is true, while the experts roundly say it is not. https://www.factcheck.org/2025/01/trump-administration-makes-unsupported-claim-about-50-million-for-condoms-to-gaza/ https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2025/01/29/politics/gaza-condoms-fact-check https://apnews.com/article/gaza-condoms-fact-check-trump-50-million-26884cac6c7097d7316ca50ca4145a82 https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20250129-aid-experts-dismiss-trump-s-gaza-condoms-spending-claim https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/01/29/gaza-condoms-fact-checker-trump/ https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/no-evidence-us-spent-50-million-condoms-gaza-2025-01-30/ https://www.dw.com/en/fact-check-trumps-team-targets-usaid-with-false-claims/a-71535712
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-02-11 17:41:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 17:24:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 15:42:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 13:44:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 13:28:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 11:50:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 11:44:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 11:07:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 11:04:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 10:49:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 10:42:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 10:15:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 08:46:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 07:35:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 07:13:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 06:34:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 06:11:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 03:44:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 01:51:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 00:29:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-10 23:31:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-10 22:15:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-10 21:28:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-10 21:25:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-10 20:53:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-10 20:53:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-12 07:04:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 18:43:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 12:36:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 12:11:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 11:48:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 06:15:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 05:59:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 01:12:35 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 00:58:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-10 20:53:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 19:50:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 18:13:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 17:18:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 14:15:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 10:20:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 09:55:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 08:45:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 08:14:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 06:36:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 03:48:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-11 02:02:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-10 23:20:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-10 22:21:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-10 20:56:33 -0600 | Rating Details |