Birdwatch Note
2025-02-09 19:50:37 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. The proposed note does not refute the main claim about US funding. The rest of the tweet is opinion.
Written by EC56DD8C5C08B0DA4F272610E70434C0757022E3069FF904C6ABE6B64E5F9B59
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1887417401987174705
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1888676898886345158
- noteId - 1888676898886345158
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - EC56DD8C5C08B0DA4F272610E70434C0757022E3069FF904C6ABE6B64E5F9B59 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1739130637272
- tweetId - 1887417401987174705
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN. The proposed note does not refute the main claim about US funding. The rest of the tweet is opinion.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-02-09 14:06:59 -0600 | Rating Details |