Birdwatch Note
2025-02-07 11:39:37 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - linked source states in the first sentence that those claims were discarded as unfounded.
Written by 09CF8E7ADA771FEC8C967C77A167F4029E6A27CA77C6F5A94067E5B8B377B700
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1887323158962708877
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1887828561475826110
- noteId - 1887828561475826110
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 09CF8E7ADA771FEC8C967C77A167F4029E6A27CA77C6F5A94067E5B8B377B700 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1738928377871
- tweetId - 1887323158962708877
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN - linked source states in the first sentence that those claims were discarded as unfounded.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-02-07 12:15:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-07 09:32:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-07 07:08:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-08 18:40:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-07 12:16:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-07 05:57:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-07 09:30:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-07 05:46:44 -0600 | Rating Details |