Birdwatch Note
2025-02-06 03:30:54 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
This photo was taken on February 6th, 1972, not in 1969. It was a training session for Apollo 16. The NASA image number is 72-h-249. https://www.sciencetimes.com/articles/33508/20210918/conspiracy-theories-claim-apollo-16s-moon-landing-fake-images-astronauts.htm
Written by 84C8D1FA0D35A0EFCA7F83AE800DEBF008271345F680619D091EDAD3A6B0A934
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1887318679076872677
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1887343183207498064
- noteId - 1887343183207498064
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 84C8D1FA0D35A0EFCA7F83AE800DEBF008271345F680619D091EDAD3A6B0A934 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1738812654675
- tweetId - 1887318679076872677
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- This photo was taken on February 6th, 1972, not in 1969. It was a training session for Apollo 16. The NASA image number is 72-h-249. https://www.sciencetimes.com/articles/33508/20210918/conspiracy-theories-claim-apollo-16s-moon-landing-fake-images-astronauts.htm
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-02-06 09:26:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-06 07:44:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-06 04:56:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-06 04:15:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-06 04:04:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 23:09:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 22:52:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 22:46:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 22:45:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 22:43:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 22:29:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 22:25:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 22:05:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-06 09:53:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 23:12:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 22:56:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 22:50:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 22:49:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 22:49:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 22:47:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 22:42:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 22:27:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 22:26:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 22:25:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-09 18:03:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-06 08:00:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 23:03:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 22:58:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 22:57:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 22:33:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 22:06:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 21:57:38 -0600 | Rating Details |