Birdwatch Note
2025-02-05 19:24:20 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
There is no evidence that Tulsi Gabbard is a Russian agent. While she has faced criticism for her views on Russia and Syria, no proof supports claims of her being a Russian asset. https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/01/politics/tulsi-gabbard-cpac-ukraine-russia/index.html
Written by 1562290224FD9AA54ADA2AF681490E0F7667EC50B6B34E504033F48E2E4A8869
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1886907609770549570
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1887220735682486581
- noteId - 1887220735682486581
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 1562290224FD9AA54ADA2AF681490E0F7667EC50B6B34E504033F48E2E4A8869 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1738783460909
- tweetId - 1886907609770549570
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- There is no evidence that Tulsi Gabbard is a Russian agent. While she has faced criticism for her views on Russia and Syria, no proof supports claims of her being a Russian asset. https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/01/politics/tulsi-gabbard-cpac-ukraine-russia/index.html
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-02-06 15:00:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-06 11:43:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-06 11:20:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-06 07:39:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-06 06:21:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 21:07:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 20:35:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 18:51:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 15:09:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 14:32:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 14:28:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 14:23:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 14:14:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 14:01:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 13:36:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 13:28:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-06 21:18:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-06 08:00:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-06 07:15:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-06 04:49:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-06 03:24:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 21:52:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 17:44:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 15:52:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 15:04:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 14:36:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 14:26:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 13:42:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-06 06:57:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-06 00:40:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 21:03:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 18:55:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 14:16:34 -0600 | Rating Details |