Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2025-02-05 06:17:50 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

The proposed note should be a comment.

Written by 43E33B7BBA491A9FEE8160B3875DA97FCC9044B3AD608A313094C49059E7D6BF
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1886950956866142381

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1887022806489325920
  • noteId - 1887022806489325920
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 43E33B7BBA491A9FEE8160B3875DA97FCC9044B3AD608A313094C49059E7D6BF Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1738736270913
  • tweetId - 1886950956866142381
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The proposed note should be a comment.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2025-02-05 01:26:47 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-05 00:31:01 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-06 08:32:56 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-05 03:00:35 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-05 02:45:35 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-05 01:27:54 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-05 00:44:15 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-05 03:06:29 -0600 Rating Details