Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2025-02-04 06:50:01 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

The poster is asking a question and the data supplied supports their point of view. The 38 million to eco alliance was partially used to further subcontract for work in wuhan as detailed in this article here. https://www.science.org/content/article/federal-officials-suspend-funding-ecohealth-alliance-nonprofit-entangled-covid-19

Written by 4D411D2CC97BDF69A74FA18EBA89FEF22C89B060CF06651459B7C5DE957EFBE6
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1886388995334017150

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1886668514288619667
  • noteId - 1886668514288619667
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 4D411D2CC97BDF69A74FA18EBA89FEF22C89B060CF06651459B7C5DE957EFBE6 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1738651801070
  • tweetId - 1886388995334017150
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The poster is asking a question and the data supplied supports their point of view. The 38 million to eco alliance was partially used to further subcontract for work in wuhan as detailed in this article here. https://www.science.org/content/article/federal-officials-suspend-funding-ecohealth-alliance-nonprofit-entangled-covid-19

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2025-02-04 16:39:08 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 14:29:46 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 13:41:36 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 10:58:51 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 10:47:22 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 10:40:37 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 08:47:13 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 08:07:50 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 07:58:58 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 07:10:22 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 06:34:59 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 06:17:09 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 05:14:43 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 05:04:33 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 04:10:52 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 03:18:05 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 03:11:03 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 02:44:34 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 02:35:49 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 01:36:45 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-05 07:57:13 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-05 05:01:56 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 15:29:24 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 14:34:32 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 12:44:28 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 08:54:14 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 08:05:32 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 06:32:50 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 05:10:59 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 04:49:51 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 03:50:24 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 03:10:07 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 01:34:59 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 00:56:05 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-06 22:44:48 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-06 17:20:35 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 22:23:23 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 21:09:01 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 17:42:53 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 15:27:57 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 07:50:14 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 06:56:40 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 06:19:13 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 02:50:36 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-04 01:07:26 -0600 Rating Details