Birdwatch Note
2025-02-03 05:11:23 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Mittlerweile wurde der Artikel des Autors vom SPIEGEL selbst an mehreren Stellen korrigiert: https://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/mensch/migration-friedrich-merz-faellt-auf-den-psychotrick-der-afd-herein-a-f76a4721-bc6f-4a5e-aff8-845eaa45c058?sara_ref=re-so-tw-sh Die Kritik an diesem Artikel und den dort genannten und hier verteidigten "Fakten" war und ist berechtigt.
Written by 5EBCC2D0D9269B4947CE00C810A70E9EEDF58C46CF2FECF19CBABCD82CFE9A43
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1886137249747652676
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1886281306243252393
- noteId - 1886281306243252393
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 5EBCC2D0D9269B4947CE00C810A70E9EEDF58C46CF2FECF19CBABCD82CFE9A43 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1738559483477
- tweetId - 1886137249747652676
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Mittlerweile wurde der Artikel des Autors vom SPIEGEL selbst an mehreren Stellen korrigiert: https://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/mensch/migration-friedrich-merz-faellt-auf-den-psychotrick-der-afd-herein-a-f76a4721-bc6f-4a5e-aff8-845eaa45c058?sara_ref=re-so-tw-sh Die Kritik an diesem Artikel und den dort genannten und hier verteidigten "Fakten" war und ist berechtigt.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-02-03 11:55:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-03 07:00:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-03 05:06:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-03 04:25:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-03 03:16:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-03 03:04:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-03 03:01:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-03 02:40:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-03 02:33:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-03 02:29:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-03 02:24:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-03 01:51:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-03 01:15:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-03 00:34:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 23:55:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-03 02:56:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-03 05:53:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-03 02:54:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-03 02:29:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 23:34:35 -0600 | Rating Details |