Birdwatch Note
2025-02-02 20:32:40 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Como dito pelo próprio autor do tweet nos comentários, isto é um bait para gerar engajamento, até porque a volta de Neymar Jr ao Santos bateu recorde de engajamento de um clube brasileiro. https://www.lance.com.br/santos/chegada-de-neymar-impulsiona-em-400-valor-de-patrocinio-no-santos.html
Written by A34CDF68AF6546FDF8F2E6DF9CEC0050574254B4D13E6BF6D6AAB6E214BB2559
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1885429548625379377
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1886150765372174512
- noteId - 1886150765372174512
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - A34CDF68AF6546FDF8F2E6DF9CEC0050574254B4D13E6BF6D6AAB6E214BB2559 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1738528360109
- tweetId - 1885429548625379377
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Como dito pelo próprio autor do tweet nos comentários, isto é um bait para gerar engajamento, até porque a volta de Neymar Jr ao Santos bateu recorde de engajamento de um clube brasileiro. https://www.lance.com.br/santos/chegada-de-neymar-impulsiona-em-400-valor-de-patrocinio-no-santos.html
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2025-02-02 17:02:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-02 16:41:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-04 11:42:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-03 11:32:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-03 06:40:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-03 06:03:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-02 20:29:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-02 17:09:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-02 16:44:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-03 19:02:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-02 15:13:46 -0600 | Rating Details |