Birdwatch Note
2025-02-02 09:48:16 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The proposed CN is pedantic. The video indeed gives an accurate example of a sailor's lighter. Doesn't try to claim it as an antique original (though it may well be, no proof either way), nor indulges in deception. What's next, CNs for harmless typos & grammatical errors?
Written by FF3D6A9C41971EEAC064F129B9AA37B6ED969A701B7781E43C210864A0CB4D45
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1884897230772969563
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1885988598547440088
- noteId - 1885988598547440088
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - FF3D6A9C41971EEAC064F129B9AA37B6ED969A701B7781E43C210864A0CB4D45 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1738489696524
- tweetId - 1884897230772969563
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- The proposed CN is pedantic. The video indeed gives an accurate example of a sailor's lighter. Doesn't try to claim it as an antique original (though it may well be, no proof either way), nor indulges in deception. What's next, CNs for harmless typos & grammatical errors?
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-02-02 05:11:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 04:00:54 -0600 | Rating Details |