Birdwatch Note
2025-01-31 15:21:43 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN it's still, factually, blackface even if it "wasn't discussed in Brazil prior to 2015"
Written by 150D3478069FC83D06CDEB78779BBDD8AEA3FD3E80C48442479BA089985F3890
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1885012568563212707
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1885347738084098336
- noteId - 1885347738084098336
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 150D3478069FC83D06CDEB78779BBDD8AEA3FD3E80C48442479BA089985F3890 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1738336903484
- tweetId - 1885012568563212707
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN it's still, factually, blackface even if it "wasn't discussed in Brazil prior to 2015"
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2025-01-31 14:10:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-31 10:17:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-31 19:09:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-31 13:21:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-31 15:46:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-31 15:22:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-31 11:10:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-31 10:10:58 -0600 | Rating Details |