Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2025-01-30 10:39:52 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

This does not work. Just no. That's it. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/no

Written by B3F2F0CF8D880D96AF303F7D5A7DD368E7BFAAF3503C6BB8BC276D84F94787B4
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1884566054564978909

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1884914419433677130
  • noteId - 1884914419433677130
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - B3F2F0CF8D880D96AF303F7D5A7DD368E7BFAAF3503C6BB8BC276D84F94787B4 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1738233592266
  • tweetId - 1884566054564978909
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • This does not work. Just no. That's it. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/no

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2025-01-30 04:57:10 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-30 05:39:52 -0600 Rating Details