Birdwatch Note
2025-01-30 02:59:56 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN, the OP confirms in the thread it is NOT a DC Police Helicopter, but a U.S. Army Blackhawk.
Written by 3A510301A6766D60D7BCD183C97499DB34D705AFA138B7D2EC14CFC3C38015F0
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1884786140504334344
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1884798674028450300
- noteId - 1884798674028450300
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 3A510301A6766D60D7BCD183C97499DB34D705AFA138B7D2EC14CFC3C38015F0 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1738205996411
- tweetId - 1884786140504334344
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN, the OP confirms in the thread it is NOT a DC Police Helicopter, but a U.S. Army Blackhawk.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-01-30 03:08:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-30 01:42:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-30 01:41:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-30 00:50:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-30 00:24:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-29 23:48:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-29 23:03:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-29 22:09:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-29 22:08:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-29 22:00:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-29 21:49:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-29 21:38:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-29 21:36:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-29 21:34:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-29 21:33:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-29 21:30:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-29 21:29:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-29 21:28:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-29 21:26:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-29 21:24:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-29 21:20:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-29 21:20:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-29 21:14:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-29 21:08:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-29 21:06:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-29 21:00:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-29 21:41:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-29 21:28:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-29 21:16:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-29 21:15:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-29 21:12:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-29 21:11:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-29 21:09:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-29 21:08:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-29 21:06:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-29 21:02:09 -0600 | Rating Details |