Birdwatch Note
2025-01-28 02:32:42 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The proposed note makes no sense. If the database was outdated the DOJ could have updated, as it has been doing prior to the Trump administration.
Written by 57F4B3F96CBF2541DD23A3A02F2F03937C47F2BEEA139CE05EBE7CD0D660B391
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1883882348875551106
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1884067045534212175
- noteId - 1884067045534212175
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 57F4B3F96CBF2541DD23A3A02F2F03937C47F2BEEA139CE05EBE7CD0D660B391 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1738031562585
- tweetId - 1883882348875551106
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- The proposed note makes no sense. If the database was outdated the DOJ could have updated, as it has been doing prior to the Trump administration.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-02-01 22:31:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-28 08:35:43 -0600 | Rating Details |