Birdwatch Note
2025-01-27 12:40:26 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
If there is nothing factually inaccurate in the post, save your quibble over verbiage for the comments.
Written by A9BA96336AC49F2B9E5BF4281588D37DBAFC6A84697A3C80F58FEE17F00AE7D6
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1882863423421350043
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1883857596840333713
- noteId - 1883857596840333713
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - A9BA96336AC49F2B9E5BF4281588D37DBAFC6A84697A3C80F58FEE17F00AE7D6 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1737981626125
- tweetId - 1882863423421350043
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- If there is nothing factually inaccurate in the post, save your quibble over verbiage for the comments.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-01-27 09:36:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-27 12:14:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-29 23:49:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-29 08:06:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-27 12:41:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-27 08:01:25 -0600 | Rating Details |