Birdwatch Note
2025-01-27 01:43:10 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
No actual proof is provided in the Content Note, therefore it is irrelevant. Stop abusing the Notes. https://www.lawinsider.com/dictionary/credible-evidence
Written by 6252EDB1D9D141B0BCB38694AFAD46302B27BE981760E16221C7424C401C6E36
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1883648029435302123
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1883692192759251252
- noteId - 1883692192759251252
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 6252EDB1D9D141B0BCB38694AFAD46302B27BE981760E16221C7424C401C6E36 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1737942190720
- tweetId - 1883648029435302123
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- No actual proof is provided in the Content Note, therefore it is irrelevant. Stop abusing the Notes. https://www.lawinsider.com/dictionary/credible-evidence
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-01-27 03:19:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-26 19:57:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-26 19:56:37 -0600 | Rating Details |