Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2025-01-26 01:43:43 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

"Low confidence" in intelligence assessments means the information is either limited, unreliable, or subject to significant debate. Therefore, the post is misleading. Both scenarios - lab origin and natural origin - remain plausible. https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/cia-now-says-covid-19-more-likely-have-come-lab-2025-01-25/ https://apnews.com/article/covid-cia-trump-china-pandemic-lab-leak-9ab7e84c626fed68ca13c8d2e453dde1

Written by DE18A4ECB9C2F0B1AFDFFE7BDC5F1C753B092188DF4DAF6D5F2054159EAE7481
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1883278998870073667

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1883329942538334253
  • noteId - 1883329942538334253
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - DE18A4ECB9C2F0B1AFDFFE7BDC5F1C753B092188DF4DAF6D5F2054159EAE7481 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1737855823536
  • tweetId - 1883278998870073667
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • "Low confidence" in intelligence assessments means the information is either limited, unreliable, or subject to significant debate. Therefore, the post is misleading. Both scenarios - lab origin and natural origin - remain plausible. https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/cia-now-says-covid-19-more-likely-have-come-lab-2025-01-25/ https://apnews.com/article/covid-cia-trump-china-pandemic-lab-leak-9ab7e84c626fed68ca13c8d2e453dde1

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2025-01-26 08:26:17 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-26 07:35:51 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-26 00:02:25 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-25 21:29:03 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-26 08:00:03 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-25 22:27:40 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-26 01:25:53 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-26 01:04:53 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-25 23:05:00 -0600 Rating Details