Birdwatch Note
2025-01-25 22:50:45 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Context: The agency made its new assessment with “low confidence,” which means the intelligence behind it is fragmentary and incomplete. A CIA spokeswoman said the other theory remains plausible and they will continue to evaluate any credible new intelligence. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/25/us/politics/cia-covid-lab-leak.html
Written by F735563C1D6CACAE98B239A5BF3B6B29334E5A32093D655B66C4A4A96408409D
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1883226845493297660
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1883286413355196597
- noteId - 1883286413355196597
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - F735563C1D6CACAE98B239A5BF3B6B29334E5A32093D655B66C4A4A96408409D Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1737845445370
- tweetId - 1883226845493297660
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 1
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Context: The agency made its new assessment with “low confidence,” which means the intelligence behind it is fragmentary and incomplete. A CIA spokeswoman said the other theory remains plausible and they will continue to evaluate any credible new intelligence. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/25/us/politics/cia-covid-lab-leak.html
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-01-26 13:09:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-26 12:40:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-26 11:10:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-26 05:57:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 20:33:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 19:39:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 19:07:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 18:35:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 18:01:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 17:35:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 17:34:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 17:29:35 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-27 09:39:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-27 08:29:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-27 18:09:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-27 12:15:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-27 12:15:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-27 12:04:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-27 11:50:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-27 09:54:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-26 14:56:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-26 08:10:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 23:22:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 18:22:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 17:25:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-26 16:52:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-26 12:03:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-26 08:49:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 23:23:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 21:32:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 19:12:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 17:01:34 -0600 | Rating Details |