Birdwatch Note
2025-01-25 22:16:19 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Khusanov actually played quite well after his early errors. The telegraph have a history of belittling players to suit their own agenda and posting negative articles to try and generate clicks. https://www.fotmob.com/en-GB/matches/chelsea-vs-manchester-city/2d55kw?player=1362998#4506609:tab=lineup
Written by F3AE59004492DCC8ABB944F49989DEA86C578216A46910E71FCB2BD292AB5618
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1883250754628243679
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1883277750007652388
- noteId - 1883277750007652388
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - F3AE59004492DCC8ABB944F49989DEA86C578216A46910E71FCB2BD292AB5618 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1737843379867
- tweetId - 1883250754628243679
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Khusanov actually played quite well after his early errors. The telegraph have a history of belittling players to suit their own agenda and posting negative articles to try and generate clicks. https://www.fotmob.com/en-GB/matches/chelsea-vs-manchester-city/2d55kw?player=1362998#4506609:tab=lineup
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-01-26 10:18:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-26 09:37:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-26 08:55:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-26 07:45:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-26 03:15:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 20:07:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 18:07:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 18:03:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 17:38:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 17:26:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 17:22:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 16:56:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 16:54:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 16:25:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 16:24:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-26 19:54:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-26 01:47:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-26 01:43:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 19:32:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 17:42:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 17:09:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 17:05:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 16:54:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 16:40:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 16:31:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-26 09:45:35 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 21:49:35 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 18:11:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 17:13:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 16:36:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-26 14:52:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-26 10:29:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-26 09:59:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-26 05:56:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-26 04:52:35 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 21:22:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 18:16:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 17:44:08 -0600 | Rating Details |