Birdwatch Note
2025-01-24 20:15:01 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The vast majority of the notes here are supporting the op’s x They should not be notes Better they’re in response out in the open
Written by 5FD34BF6BFFB8348112A5AEF5CCA8C9F9AE65CFBB534E43B24BB14965B9297C7
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1882575625170436139
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1882884834705453350
- noteId - 1882884834705453350
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 5FD34BF6BFFB8348112A5AEF5CCA8C9F9AE65CFBB534E43B24BB14965B9297C7 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1737749701559
- tweetId - 1882575625170436139
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- The vast majority of the notes here are supporting the op’s x They should not be notes Better they’re in response out in the open
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-01-24 18:17:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-24 14:31:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-24 16:22:03 -0600 | Rating Details |