Birdwatch Note
2025-01-24 05:45:00 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
術例100万件に対してサンプリング600件が統計的に考えて一概に不適切とは言えません。 2009年の調査時点からレーシックの術式が大幅に改善されて後遺症の発生率が下がっているなどの背景があるのならそれを提示すべきです。 そういった背景がないのであれば、2009年の調査に基づく発言を一概に誤解を招くこととは言えません。
Written by 57E0555E5CF80E98D0F240C6082FD4E734050ED875AB53C9B7361C60C04AD453
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1882370288740151664
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1882665886718570533
- noteId - 1882665886718570533
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 57E0555E5CF80E98D0F240C6082FD4E734050ED875AB53C9B7361C60C04AD453 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1737697500292
- tweetId - 1882370288740151664
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- 術例100万件に対してサンプリング600件が統計的に考えて一概に不適切とは言えません。 2009年の調査時点からレーシックの術式が大幅に改善されて後遺症の発生率が下がっているなどの背景があるのならそれを提示すべきです。 そういった背景がないのであれば、2009年の調査に基づく発言を一概に誤解を招くこととは言えません。
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-01-24 18:59:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-24 10:19:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-24 10:19:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-24 10:00:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-24 09:07:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-24 08:58:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-24 08:09:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-24 07:56:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-24 05:42:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-24 05:12:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-24 03:38:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-24 03:24:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-24 02:57:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-24 02:15:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-24 02:12:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-24 02:06:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-24 01:27:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-24 00:51:35 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-24 00:43:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-24 00:43:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-24 00:36:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-24 00:35:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-24 00:32:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-24 00:20:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-25 03:07:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-24 19:24:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-24 19:19:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-24 19:15:40 -0600 | Rating Details |