Birdwatch Note
2025-01-22 11:17:56 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
藤江成光は札幌市等の全数調査で接種後死亡率がコロナ禍前死亡率以下だと示しました https://x.com/i/birdwatch/n/1838104949739438489 https://x.com/i/birdwatch/n/1818310334022849017 https://x.com/i/birdwatch/n/1796531842239328387 予防接種健康被害救済制度の認定数=救済数≠被害者数です。 厳密な医学的因果は不要(p.3)で東大病院ルンバール事件判例(p.5)の通り法的因果だけ求めます https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/10900000/000864824.pdf 同判例で法的因果に科学並の厳密さは不要です https://www.courts.go.jp/app/files/hanrei_jp/204/054204_hanrei.pdf https://president.jp/articles/-/90457 https://www.pref.nara.jp/secure/306958/jushinsyoumeisyo_manual.pdf https://megalodon.jp/2023-1230-1244-46/https://newsdig.tbs.co.jp:443/articles/cbc/908338?page=5 https://x.com/WideRangeThink/status/1820023214975926716 グレー認定事例もあり https://x.com/WideRangeThink/status/1813560836000215327 https://x.com/WideRangeThink/status/1820810425635946589 同じ制度全体の認定率は米英仏独加濠が50%未満に対して日本は80%以上(障害35%→大半の否認理由は軽症、死亡67%)です https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e121 https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/shingi/shingi-shippei_127696_00001.html https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/shingi/shingi-shippei_127696_00006.html 科学的な安全性評価ではほぼ因果が認められません https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/vaccine_qa.html#34 https://www.mhlw.go.jp/bunya/kenkou/kekkaku-kansenshou20/hukuhannou_houkoku/index.html https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/shingi/shingi-kousei_284075.html https://togetter.com/li/2416068
Written by EE7192EF0B1C47D8A3430C3E070DA2A0BFAA58717F9133404318E9D7666B1A00
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1881592468191555585
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1882024896290865209
- noteId - 1882024896290865209
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - EE7192EF0B1C47D8A3430C3E070DA2A0BFAA58717F9133404318E9D7666B1A00 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1737544676265
- tweetId - 1881592468191555585
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- 藤江成光は札幌市等の全数調査で接種後死亡率がコロナ禍前死亡率以下だと示しました https://x.com/i/birdwatch/n/1838104949739438489 https://x.com/i/birdwatch/n/1818310334022849017 https://x.com/i/birdwatch/n/1796531842239328387 予防接種健康被害救済制度の認定数=救済数≠被害者数です。 厳密な医学的因果は不要(p.3)で東大病院ルンバール事件判例(p.5)の通り法的因果だけ求めます https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/10900000/000864824.pdf 同判例で法的因果に科学並の厳密さは不要です https://www.courts.go.jp/app/files/hanrei_jp/204/054204_hanrei.pdf https://president.jp/articles/-/90457 https://www.pref.nara.jp/secure/306958/jushinsyoumeisyo_manual.pdf https://megalodon.jp/2023-1230-1244-46/https://newsdig.tbs.co.jp:443/articles/cbc/908338?page=5 https://x.com/WideRangeThink/status/1820023214975926716 グレー認定事例もあり https://x.com/WideRangeThink/status/1813560836000215327 https://x.com/WideRangeThink/status/1820810425635946589 同じ制度全体の認定率は米英仏独加濠が50%未満に対して日本は80%以上(障害35%→大半の否認理由は軽症、死亡67%)です https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e121 https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/shingi/shingi-shippei_127696_00001.html https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/shingi/shingi-shippei_127696_00006.html 科学的な安全性評価ではほぼ因果が認められません https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/vaccine_qa.html#34 https://www.mhlw.go.jp/bunya/kenkou/kekkaku-kansenshou20/hukuhannou_houkoku/index.html https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/shingi/shingi-kousei_284075.html https://togetter.com/li/2416068
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2025-01-22 17:44:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-22 07:07:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-22 06:40:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-23 00:59:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-22 21:19:21 -0600 | Rating Details |