Birdwatch Note
2025-01-21 13:21:12 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. This seems like the sort of distinction and extra information that goes in the comments. It’s basically spermantic. I mean, semantic.
Written by 04FADBBD0E984C25AE4E9FA400E4ABDBA03FCF078F9EC5FD915D8660328E9CF7
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1881519432163557871
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1881693530566832267
- noteId - 1881693530566832267
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 04FADBBD0E984C25AE4E9FA400E4ABDBA03FCF078F9EC5FD915D8660328E9CF7 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1737465672519
- tweetId - 1881519432163557871
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN. This seems like the sort of distinction and extra information that goes in the comments. It’s basically spermantic. I mean, semantic.