Birdwatch Note
2025-01-21 09:19:12 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - missing evidence. While the tag is still browsable, the newest entries on it appear to be at least a day old or older. Since the OP said that comments being made are deleted and wasn't referring to historic content, this remains to be evaluated.
Written by 72286DC934D847288D2DEFDCAF90A483474BE0B76BF92749F5547596C96DEBB4
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1881413113490370905
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1881632630694691302
- noteId - 1881632630694691302
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 72286DC934D847288D2DEFDCAF90A483474BE0B76BF92749F5547596C96DEBB4 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1737451152858
- tweetId - 1881413113490370905
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 1
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN - missing evidence. While the tag is still browsable, the newest entries on it appear to be at least a day old or older. Since the OP said that comments being made are deleted and wasn't referring to historic content, this remains to be evaluated.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-01-21 08:37:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-21 05:06:55 -0600 | Rating Details |