Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2025-01-20 18:15:31 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Anecdotal evidence is not a factual evidence but rather faulty generalisation in this case - if a couple posts claim they reversed their pre-order or decided not to order does not disprove the fact that global pre-order sales (as provided by D. Vávra) did not drop. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faulty_generalization

Written by 64B2F5EBBE99ED2F6A73AA402D04A5766095663930A55F2BC28C19F70EE0928B
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1881299354621026319

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1881405209101926706
  • noteId - 1881405209101926706
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 64B2F5EBBE99ED2F6A73AA402D04A5766095663930A55F2BC28C19F70EE0928B Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1737396931326
  • tweetId - 1881299354621026319
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Anecdotal evidence is not a factual evidence but rather faulty generalisation in this case - if a couple posts claim they reversed their pre-order or decided not to order does not disprove the fact that global pre-order sales (as provided by D. Vávra) did not drop. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faulty_generalization

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2025-01-20 13:44:55 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-20 13:28:59 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-20 13:08:16 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-20 12:36:51 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-22 04:26:56 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-20 21:22:19 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-20 20:44:13 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-22 00:53:34 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-21 00:02:11 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-20 22:14:28 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-20 15:20:18 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-20 15:12:37 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-20 15:07:44 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-20 15:01:53 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-20 12:46:31 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-21 11:28:20 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-21 07:20:37 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-20 21:08:17 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-20 18:15:47 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-20 16:32:57 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-20 15:46:34 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-20 15:08:01 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-20 12:56:05 -0600 Rating Details