Birdwatch Note
2025-01-19 20:06:01 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The OP clearly states his and/or others opinion. Note not needed just because someone wants a note attached to give the appearance of discredit to the post. Argue in the comments, publicly, rather than anonymously creating a note, “just because”.
Written by 443D0EE24EDF806853022CED0BF233BABB6F0D09521C639E130D63AE8F5D785C
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1880429256376758462
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1881070631061499958
- noteId - 1881070631061499958
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 443D0EE24EDF806853022CED0BF233BABB6F0D09521C639E130D63AE8F5D785C Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1737317161704
- tweetId - 1880429256376758462
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- The OP clearly states his and/or others opinion. Note not needed just because someone wants a note attached to give the appearance of discredit to the post. Argue in the comments, publicly, rather than anonymously creating a note, “just because”.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-01-20 03:17:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-19 14:40:22 -0600 | Rating Details |