Birdwatch Note
2025-01-19 12:03:57 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
There is no source about this. So it is a rumour without any proof to consolidate it and probably this post was made with the purpose of interactions farming to profit from the blue checkmark. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/rumour
Written by 887CB17909EBF5B028C2AF055658FE970632F0C2C4E5F840D7FB1C98E9BFC01C
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1880481031016575051
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1880949313456812039
- noteId - 1880949313456812039
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 887CB17909EBF5B028C2AF055658FE970632F0C2C4E5F840D7FB1C98E9BFC01C Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1737288237333
- tweetId - 1880481031016575051
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- There is no source about this. So it is a rumour without any proof to consolidate it and probably this post was made with the purpose of interactions farming to profit from the blue checkmark. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/rumour
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-01-19 16:57:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-19 06:44:09 -0600 | Rating Details |