Birdwatch Note
2025-01-19 01:14:37 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. the proposed note is relevant to the child post, maybe, but definitely isn’t relevant to the quote.
Written by 52B8696BD07B0DC70590104ED5C5040AD912AB76FDCF5E2815D1180C4EB46891
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1880471007225606386
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1880785903242625177
- noteId - 1880785903242625177
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 52B8696BD07B0DC70590104ED5C5040AD912AB76FDCF5E2815D1180C4EB46891 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1737249277302
- tweetId - 1880471007225606386
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN. the proposed note is relevant to the child post, maybe, but definitely isn’t relevant to the quote.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-01-19 13:03:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-19 06:03:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-18 21:05:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-18 20:52:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-18 20:50:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-18 20:16:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-18 19:34:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-19 06:57:06 -0600 | Rating Details |