Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2025-01-18 16:40:25 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

元ツイートは、意見を述べるものにすぎませんので、誤解を招くものではなく、反論はリプライ等で行うべきです。

Written by 9DBB841913897FFF7487B891F35CD3BDC985C1DA172F7A15E059B79FA8B94A14
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1879828503056859397

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1880656503046299763
  • noteId - 1880656503046299763
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 9DBB841913897FFF7487B891F35CD3BDC985C1DA172F7A15E059B79FA8B94A14 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1737218425892
  • tweetId - 1879828503056859397
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • 元ツイートは、意見を述べるものにすぎませんので、誤解を招くものではなく、反論はリプライ等で行うべきです。

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2025-01-18 11:19:36 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-19 20:15:03 -0600 Rating Details