Birdwatch Note
2025-01-17 15:55:28 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Misleading: The thread speculates that Rs 460 billion payment to SC from the recovered amount is part of a quid pro quo between PTI and Riaz. However, part of £190M settlement between NCA and Riaz included payment towards Rs 460 billion Bahria Town case. See pt. 45: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2021/2781.pdf
Written by 665C141AB00B9E3984D4B0CE401C76FA91C0CB6443A215C5C8F3D0ABD51CBE8B
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1880187029579001977
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1880282801880133759
- noteId - 1880282801880133759
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 665C141AB00B9E3984D4B0CE401C76FA91C0CB6443A215C5C8F3D0ABD51CBE8B Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1737129328591
- tweetId - 1880187029579001977
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Misleading: The thread speculates that Rs 460 billion payment to SC from the recovered amount is part of a quid pro quo between PTI and Riaz. However, part of £190M settlement between NCA and Riaz included payment towards Rs 460 billion Bahria Town case. See pt. 45: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2021/2781.pdf
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-01-18 01:06:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-17 15:13:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-17 10:00:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-17 14:47:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-18 01:26:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-17 23:48:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-17 15:17:32 -0600 | Rating Details |