Birdwatch Note
2025-01-15 22:27:14 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. Different polls can give different results, there’s nothing wrong with his post
Written by 4D718513B10B18FF9056ED9828A22FD4647CEF8BED71BFA1570AEBA773CF396C
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1877714789536854126
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1879656616498172158
- noteId - 1879656616498172158
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 4D718513B10B18FF9056ED9828A22FD4647CEF8BED71BFA1570AEBA773CF396C Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1736980034361
- tweetId - 1877714789536854126
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN. Different polls can give different results, there’s nothing wrong with his post
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-01-16 06:16:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-16 02:15:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-16 01:18:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-15 18:15:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-15 17:08:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-15 17:05:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-15 21:08:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-16 11:30:46 -0600 | Rating Details |