Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2025-01-14 13:56:26 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Materials obtained in discovery during civil proceedings can only be used for that specific case. Violating this rule, as per Irish Supreme Court in Ambiorix Ltd. v. Minister for the Environment [1991] IESC 3, constitutes contempt of court. https://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5da027304653d058440f935f https://x.com/Care2much18/status/1879075458769432970

Written by DD9D3106BF50F814B3D92EC6CFA95546B5710177C3E0FE36000A27E09305C258
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1878883562759635246

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1879165682249572487
  • noteId - 1879165682249572487
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - DD9D3106BF50F814B3D92EC6CFA95546B5710177C3E0FE36000A27E09305C258 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1736862986516
  • tweetId - 1878883562759635246
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 1
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Materials obtained in discovery during civil proceedings can only be used for that specific case. Violating this rule, as per Irish Supreme Court in Ambiorix Ltd. v. Minister for the Environment [1991] IESC 3, constitutes contempt of court. https://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5da027304653d058440f935f https://x.com/Care2much18/status/1879075458769432970

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2025-01-14 18:32:07 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-14 14:33:30 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-14 13:58:17 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-14 10:04:22 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-14 07:58:26 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-14 10:02:57 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-14 09:08:48 -0600 Rating Details