Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2025-01-13 16:19:49 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Ce qu'affirme Fabrice Epelboin est factuellement faux. De nombreux médias de la planète ont couvert les Twitter Files. On peut par exemple trouver des dizaines de références d'articles de médias (dont CNN ou la BBC) sur la notice Wikipédia dédiée au sujet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter_Files

Written by A246CF05487C3617251120E6DCE98CD66124C24BCDFA49E89139E97FCC08FCA3
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1878814984190206308

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1878839377893142916
  • noteId - 1878839377893142916
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - A246CF05487C3617251120E6DCE98CD66124C24BCDFA49E89139E97FCC08FCA3 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1736785189494
  • tweetId - 1878814984190206308
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Ce qu'affirme Fabrice Epelboin est factuellement faux. De nombreux médias de la planète ont couvert les Twitter Files. On peut par exemple trouver des dizaines de références d'articles de médias (dont CNN ou la BBC) sur la notice Wikipédia dédiée au sujet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter_Files

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2025-01-14 17:09:29 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-14 11:55:21 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-14 08:25:03 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-14 06:43:58 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-14 06:38:00 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-14 04:35:11 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-14 03:42:41 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-14 01:59:13 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-14 01:13:39 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-14 00:44:30 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-13 22:39:48 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-13 20:46:04 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-13 17:45:50 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-13 17:31:58 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-13 16:26:35 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-13 15:49:17 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-13 14:56:18 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-13 14:53:59 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-13 14:38:05 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-13 14:13:27 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-13 13:18:07 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-13 12:43:07 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-13 12:24:58 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-13 12:00:30 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-13 11:42:15 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-13 11:35:37 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-13 11:22:46 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-13 11:17:59 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-13 10:59:20 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-13 10:44:40 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-17 00:45:20 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-16 05:58:56 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-14 00:41:42 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-13 20:22:59 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-13 17:51:59 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-13 15:20:49 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-13 15:00:22 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-13 13:49:19 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-13 12:01:02 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-13 11:16:22 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-13 10:48:14 -0600 Rating Details