Birdwatch Note
2025-01-12 03:04:41 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN No claim of recency was made in the post. The post accurately states that the police were sending a message, and they were. Anyone who is reasonably observant could deduce that the picture dates back to the pandemic by the fact that the officers are wearing masks.
Written by E65427D9E07564C6DDA2D9E4BCE8344A68A7B0BF383D1805107EE36841D66D5E
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1878236790244475034
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1878276889749627364
- noteId - 1878276889749627364
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - E65427D9E07564C6DDA2D9E4BCE8344A68A7B0BF383D1805107EE36841D66D5E Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1736651081870
- tweetId - 1878236790244475034
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN No claim of recency was made in the post. The post accurately states that the police were sending a message, and they were. Anyone who is reasonably observant could deduce that the picture dates back to the pandemic by the fact that the officers are wearing masks.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-01-12 14:02:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 12:18:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 09:40:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 08:19:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 07:24:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 06:20:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 05:28:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 05:17:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 04:58:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 04:55:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 04:32:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 04:15:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 04:10:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 03:53:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 03:49:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 02:48:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 02:18:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 01:51:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 23:49:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 23:45:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 23:00:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 22:59:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 22:10:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 22:00:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 22:00:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 21:31:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 21:15:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 21:09:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 17:47:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 16:13:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 13:38:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 12:07:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 09:25:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 07:53:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 04:20:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 02:24:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 02:11:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 00:20:35 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-12 00:17:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 23:01:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 22:58:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 22:35:31 -0600 | Rating Details |