Birdwatch Note
2025-01-11 17:02:00 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. Please keep semantics debate out of CN. There's a reason the phrase 'reportedly made' was used.
Written by 16690E0F256179307589DD093B9515771EF18E05844272EA5EC9298E190D590C
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1877700468316557757
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1878125219598249999
- noteId - 1878125219598249999
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 16690E0F256179307589DD093B9515771EF18E05844272EA5EC9298E190D590C Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1736614920888
- tweetId - 1877700468316557757
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN. Please keep semantics debate out of CN. There's a reason the phrase 'reportedly made' was used.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-01-11 16:43:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 14:53:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 12:26:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 14:50:43 -0600 | Rating Details |