Birdwatch Note
2025-01-10 15:45:19 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Laut Umfrage des ZDF liegen Habeck und Merz in der Kanzlerfrage gleichauf. Als Partei führt die CDU klar vor den Grünen. "Die Menschen" wollen also nicht unbedingt Habeck als Kanzler. https://www.zdf.de/nachrichten/politik/politbarometer-kanzlerfrage-habeck-merz-weidel-scholz-wahlkampf-100.html https://www.wahlrecht.de/umfragen/
Written by D4268746A457837D252C92E7BCE6C1BEBA89112FDC4EA0FEF8B6B545A0BE3D4A
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1877666167684259846
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1877743530245836866
- noteId - 1877743530245836866
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - D4268746A457837D252C92E7BCE6C1BEBA89112FDC4EA0FEF8B6B545A0BE3D4A Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1736523919056
- tweetId - 1877666167684259846
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Laut Umfrage des ZDF liegen Habeck und Merz in der Kanzlerfrage gleichauf. Als Partei führt die CDU klar vor den Grünen. "Die Menschen" wollen also nicht unbedingt Habeck als Kanzler. https://www.zdf.de/nachrichten/politik/politbarometer-kanzlerfrage-habeck-merz-weidel-scholz-wahlkampf-100.html https://www.wahlrecht.de/umfragen/
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2025-01-10 17:00:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 16:42:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 16:15:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 15:11:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 15:10:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 14:10:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 13:37:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 13:14:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 12:30:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 12:19:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 11:55:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 11:47:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 11:41:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 11:38:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 11:29:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 11:26:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 11:17:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 10:47:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 10:28:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-11 19:19:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-11 17:09:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-11 11:01:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-11 10:48:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-11 09:26:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-11 05:32:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-11 03:59:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-11 01:55:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-11 01:23:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-11 01:06:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 23:48:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 23:38:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 20:40:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 20:13:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 19:17:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-11 20:01:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-11 15:51:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-11 13:50:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-11 09:35:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-11 09:30:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-11 06:35:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-11 05:02:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-11 02:05:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-11 00:36:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 21:55:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 19:22:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 18:45:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 17:55:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 17:19:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 16:43:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 16:09:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 14:41:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 14:35:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 12:31:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 12:30:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-12 02:13:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-11 23:57:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-11 22:42:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-11 12:21:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-11 09:56:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-11 08:06:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-11 07:47:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-11 06:30:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-11 05:08:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-11 04:01:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-11 02:06:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-11 01:14:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-11 00:39:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 19:07:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 16:43:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 15:40:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 12:55:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 11:28:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 11:26:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 11:24:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 10:29:31 -0600 | Rating Details |