Birdwatch Note
2025-01-10 09:14:27 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
このポストの論旨は「コンクリ水路化した結果、ミヤリガイがほぼ根絶されたという歴史がある。それをやめたら再び脅威が蘇る可能性がないとはいえないのだから、安易にコンクリ水路をやめろとは言えないよね」です。 ミヤリガイ根絶のためにコンクリ水路化したと読み取るのは無理があります。
Written by FAF83309DB1703C6F6BBA1BBCCA8248A25526F93F2A49781C919537F1346A897
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1877348451807277321
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1877645168528253089
- noteId - 1877645168528253089
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - FAF83309DB1703C6F6BBA1BBCCA8248A25526F93F2A49781C919537F1346A897 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1736500467794
- tweetId - 1877348451807277321
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- このポストの論旨は「コンクリ水路化した結果、ミヤリガイがほぼ根絶されたという歴史がある。それをやめたら再び脅威が蘇る可能性がないとはいえないのだから、安易にコンクリ水路をやめろとは言えないよね」です。 ミヤリガイ根絶のためにコンクリ水路化したと読み取るのは無理があります。
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-01-10 17:23:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 14:59:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 09:50:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 08:14:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 07:19:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 06:55:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 06:44:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 06:37:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 05:29:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 05:26:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 04:35:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 03:58:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 03:38:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 00:27:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 20:59:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 19:40:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 22:57:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 19:04:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 09:32:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 09:27:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 06:25:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 06:18:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 06:11:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 03:37:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 06:43:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 04:25:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 03:44:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 04:14:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 16:49:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 16:12:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 09:47:35 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 05:30:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 03:56:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 03:16:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 07:17:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 06:12:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 14:15:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 11:18:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 07:39:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 07:35:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 07:16:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 07:02:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 03:28:44 -0600 | Rating Details |