Birdwatch Note
2025-01-09 22:32:01 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Note not needed. There is nothing in the original post that needs to be corrected. The proposed note raises the date of publication, but the OP was not claiming an incorrect date, so that point was irrelevant.
Written by DF2A948EFAD47F887019D658A0EE5903A1493E6ED65057CE04D85E6377B408DE
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1772024679676448798
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1877483493912879316
- noteId - 1877483493912879316
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - DF2A948EFAD47F887019D658A0EE5903A1493E6ED65057CE04D85E6377B408DE Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1736461921563
- tweetId - 1772024679676448798
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- Note not needed. There is nothing in the original post that needs to be corrected. The proposed note raises the date of publication, but the OP was not claiming an incorrect date, so that point was irrelevant.