Birdwatch Note
2025-01-09 21:13:29 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The LED lights replaced with dimmer LED lights as the originally installed ones were deemed to be unreasonably bright. They do not emit "toxic blue light" and the bright white LEDs were replaced with warm white LEDs https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13324045/woman-light-sensitivity-council-dim-LED-streetlights.html
Written by 0C42C61381A2389BA754C66A5E48D3BF2BDF15CF47BEDC132DAA04926732DFE1
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1877328944032010289
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1877463731514343913
- noteId - 1877463731514343913
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 0C42C61381A2389BA754C66A5E48D3BF2BDF15CF47BEDC132DAA04926732DFE1 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1736457209839
- tweetId - 1877328944032010289
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The LED lights replaced with dimmer LED lights as the originally installed ones were deemed to be unreasonably bright. They do not emit "toxic blue light" and the bright white LEDs were replaced with warm white LEDs https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13324045/woman-light-sensitivity-council-dim-LED-streetlights.html
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-01-09 23:07:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 16:29:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 16:00:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 15:43:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 15:26:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 18:17:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 03:53:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 02:39:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 15:57:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 15:28:55 -0600 | Rating Details |