Birdwatch Note
2025-01-08 21:34:00 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. There is ZERO requirement for anyone to cite sources in this context. You’re being obnoxiously officious for the sake of being obnoxiously officious. People with such a mentality should not have the ability to contribute to community notes.
Written by 186A4E098DF4B79A8CD99541253DE64C117D86F24DADC16B437739DF818A4AFE
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1876944504051114400
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1877106507235356764
- noteId - 1877106507235356764
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 186A4E098DF4B79A8CD99541253DE64C117D86F24DADC16B437739DF818A4AFE Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1736372040935
- tweetId - 1876944504051114400
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN. There is ZERO requirement for anyone to cite sources in this context. You’re being obnoxiously officious for the sake of being obnoxiously officious. People with such a mentality should not have the ability to contribute to community notes.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-01-08 15:38:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 16:14:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 11:49:34 -0600 | Rating Details |