Birdwatch Note
2025-01-07 09:07:48 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
"インティマシー・コーディネーター"は、ヌード場面や性的な場面において、俳優の安全を確保し、制作側との調整を行う専門職です。 「撮影を監修するフェミニスト」を指す用語ではありません。 インティマシーコーディネーターとは？ 性的シーンの撮影で俳優を“守る”役割。日本のドラマでも起用始まる(ハフポスト) https://www.huffingtonpost.jp/entry/story_jp_6344e702e4b03e8038cc82c4 俳優守るインティマシーコーディネーター 日本でも養成、安心できる作品をもっと(朝日新聞GLOBE+) https://globe.asahi.com/article/15125340
Written by 7CF8165C0DBBFDD1269214D2407351AB0D81C7A3B12F367DCB9C5EBBD440A580
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1876431139252080673
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1876556330036760669
- noteId - 1876556330036760669
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 7CF8165C0DBBFDD1269214D2407351AB0D81C7A3B12F367DCB9C5EBBD440A580 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1736240868468
- tweetId - 1876431139252080673
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- "インティマシー・コーディネーター"は、ヌード場面や性的な場面において、俳優の安全を確保し、制作側との調整を行う専門職です。 「撮影を監修するフェミニスト」を指す用語ではありません。 インティマシーコーディネーターとは？ 性的シーンの撮影で俳優を“守る”役割。日本のドラマでも起用始まる(ハフポスト) https://www.huffingtonpost.jp/entry/story_jp_6344e702e4b03e8038cc82c4 俳優守るインティマシーコーディネーター 日本でも養成、安心できる作品をもっと(朝日新聞GLOBE+) https://globe.asahi.com/article/15125340
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-01-08 09:55:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-08 04:03:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 20:46:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 11:00:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 08:54:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 08:46:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 08:13:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 07:47:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 07:01:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 06:58:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 05:57:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 04:19:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 03:50:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 03:47:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 23:53:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 06:19:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 22:55:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 22:52:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 17:42:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 15:56:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 04:42:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 02:30:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 23:40:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 22:22:35 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 09:41:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 07:04:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 04:47:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 04:37:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 03:34:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 17:44:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 09:15:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 08:14:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 05:24:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 03:32:39 -0600 | Rating Details |