Birdwatch Note
2025-01-06 21:17:28 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The photo in question IS REAL so pinned CN is blatantly incorrect claiming it is AI generated or somehow altered. The choice to use a specific photo in a post is not a violation of TOS for engagement farming since it is real & factual. She posed for this photo for GQ in 2013: https://www.gq.com/gallery/aubrey-plaza-gq-photos-august-2013
Written by A3B1CAC4BEEBC77919BAAD05AB81C2E88B1B20BBBDA71E97E3823438E176BE2A
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1875630343593832887
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1876377567743049836
- noteId - 1876377567743049836
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - A3B1CAC4BEEBC77919BAAD05AB81C2E88B1B20BBBDA71E97E3823438E176BE2A Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1736198248216
- tweetId - 1875630343593832887
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The photo in question IS REAL so pinned CN is blatantly incorrect claiming it is AI generated or somehow altered. The choice to use a specific photo in a post is not a violation of TOS for engagement farming since it is real & factual. She posed for this photo for GQ in 2013: https://www.gq.com/gallery/aubrey-plaza-gq-photos-august-2013
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2025-01-06 17:44:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-06 16:44:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-06 15:24:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-08 05:49:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-07 09:48:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-06 23:57:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-06 21:41:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-06 20:28:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-06 18:54:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-06 15:26:51 -0600 | Rating Details |