Birdwatch Note
2025-01-06 18:46:53 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The US PHS recommends a fluoride concentration of just 0.7 mg/L in drinking water: https://www.cdc.gov/fluoridation/about/community-water-fluoridation-recommendations.html The JAMA paper: “In 31 studies reporting fluoride measured in drinking water, a dose-response association was… null at less than 1.5 mg/L.” So the PHS recommendation doesn’t need reassessment.
Written by 5A101EF494281C9A5A0FCB0EC1638FB0E4EE1DD89844AA7DCD5708E506FC5EEC
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1876303152116617385
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1876339671459848317
- noteId - 1876339671459848317
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 5A101EF494281C9A5A0FCB0EC1638FB0E4EE1DD89844AA7DCD5708E506FC5EEC Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1736189213038
- tweetId - 1876303152116617385
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The US PHS recommends a fluoride concentration of just 0.7 mg/L in drinking water: https://www.cdc.gov/fluoridation/about/community-water-fluoridation-recommendations.html The JAMA paper: “In 31 studies reporting fluoride measured in drinking water, a dose-response association was… null at less than 1.5 mg/L.” So the PHS recommendation doesn’t need reassessment.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-01-06 15:46:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 15:15:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 15:12:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 15:03:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 13:37:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 14:46:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 12:16:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 11:34:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 10:17:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 09:29:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 08:06:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 03:15:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 02:12:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 00:18:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 23:53:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 22:58:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 21:42:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 21:20:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 20:07:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 13:25:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 13:04:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 13:18:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 06:31:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 01:14:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 18:01:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 14:31:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 12:09:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 23:36:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 14:23:16 -0600 | Rating Details |