Birdwatch Note
2025-01-06 10:51:30 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The article referenced is not a reliable source and does not include the full facts of the story and is therefore omitting the involvement of the old lady. Weak attempt at a CN. NNN.
Written by 52161EC2DDE19C8A46B2FD19CE30E0105F7A301E93E782B384A25F0A221813BD
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1875763941613125982
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1876220039310798975
- noteId - 1876220039310798975
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 52161EC2DDE19C8A46B2FD19CE30E0105F7A301E93E782B384A25F0A221813BD Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1736160690511
- tweetId - 1875763941613125982
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- The article referenced is not a reliable source and does not include the full facts of the story and is therefore omitting the involvement of the old lady. Weak attempt at a CN. NNN.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-01-06 08:07:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 06:08:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 19:31:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 05:37:02 -0600 | Rating Details |