Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2025-01-06 02:03:48 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/r-v-ul-nasir-judgment.pdf In point #8 of the appeal, the plaintiff's lawyer argues that the trial judge regarded the offending as aggravated due to the race and ethnicity of the victims, which he believed was incorrect. This supports the claim in the original post.  CN not needed.

Written by C5527E0501126F803EBEEE50F75599EE71F986673525DE3C0750D13A9831A487
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1875740238993342525

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1876087239945474126
  • noteId - 1876087239945474126
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - C5527E0501126F803EBEEE50F75599EE71F986673525DE3C0750D13A9831A487 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1736129028676
  • tweetId - 1875740238993342525
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/r-v-ul-nasir-judgment.pdf In point #8 of the appeal, the plaintiff's lawyer argues that the trial judge regarded the offending as aggravated due to the race and ethnicity of the victims, which he believed was incorrect. This supports the claim in the original post.  CN not needed.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2025-01-06 02:25:44 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-06 00:54:46 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-05 20:44:04 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-07 11:56:28 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-06 03:14:34 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-05 22:45:47 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-05 21:51:30 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-05 20:25:03 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-05 21:33:25 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-05 21:30:35 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-06 06:54:47 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-21 18:37:59 -0600 Rating Details