Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2025-01-04 13:25:47 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

This is a digital alteration of Neuschwanstein. The reality looks different. Compare: www.neuschwanstein.de

Written by FAB6DB1E0564127ED3515F9EE59FCF34CC1DB73A12E78470D9AFDC3440EFC55D
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1875244665815101647

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1875534091317117341
  • noteId - 1875534091317117341
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - FAB6DB1E0564127ED3515F9EE59FCF34CC1DB73A12E78470D9AFDC3440EFC55D Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1735997147766
  • tweetId - 1875244665815101647
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 1
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • This is a digital alteration of Neuschwanstein. The reality looks different. Compare: www.neuschwanstein.de

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2025-01-04 09:02:33 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-04 07:53:44 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-06 08:37:27 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-04 12:08:14 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-04 10:30:37 -0600 Rating Details