Birdwatch Note
2025-01-04 05:09:26 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
帯状疱疹はコロナワクチン接種者や接種直後に、微妙な客観的医療記録の増加があるかは最新のメタ解析ではリスクが、検出できておらず未だ未確立の事象です https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jmv.29629?casa_token=vpluIDNnCLkAAAAA%3AFnn9R-w0288jz0apVwEhVuK5MUIr8UPs9xsjeaUgSPUqSd1QtuWezEcA3WPExdHOeuprQoF4lAV2Vvuw なお、帯状疱疹は初診患者数が21年,22年にコロナ禍前より減少している(下記２つめの図)ようにコロナワクチンはいずれにせよ動態に見える影響を与えてません。 https://web.archive.org/web/20230725185950/https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/6ca1c6739b46d8201f28467a56bfd773cc2332af また本記事は2014年からの水痘ワクチン接種により、年少者で水痘が激減→ 親世代が天然の追加接種を受けれなくなる→ 親世代で同じウイルスの起こす帯状疱疹がその頃に増加 という話で、コロナ禍前からの現象の話です。 下記が2018年の感染研の解説です https://www.niid.go.jp/niid/ja/allarticles/surveillance/2433-iasr/related-articles/related-articles-462/8235-462r07.html
Written by F4D2E4CA66E08B99BDDE8328BBF4C2313B853B3595C8AC38600E463328C72D9D
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1875373700792664198
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1875409180083036294
- noteId - 1875409180083036294
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - F4D2E4CA66E08B99BDDE8328BBF4C2313B853B3595C8AC38600E463328C72D9D Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1735967366606
- tweetId - 1875373700792664198
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 1
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- 帯状疱疹はコロナワクチン接種者や接種直後に、微妙な客観的医療記録の増加があるかは最新のメタ解析ではリスクが、検出できておらず未だ未確立の事象です https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jmv.29629?casa_token=vpluIDNnCLkAAAAA%3AFnn9R-w0288jz0apVwEhVuK5MUIr8UPs9xsjeaUgSPUqSd1QtuWezEcA3WPExdHOeuprQoF4lAV2Vvuw なお、帯状疱疹は初診患者数が21年,22年にコロナ禍前より減少している(下記２つめの図)ようにコロナワクチンはいずれにせよ動態に見える影響を与えてません。 https://web.archive.org/web/20230725185950/https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/6ca1c6739b46d8201f28467a56bfd773cc2332af また本記事は2014年からの水痘ワクチン接種により、年少者で水痘が激減→ 親世代が天然の追加接種を受けれなくなる→ 親世代で同じウイルスの起こす帯状疱疹がその頃に増加 という話で、コロナ禍前からの現象の話です。 下記が2018年の感染研の解説です https://www.niid.go.jp/niid/ja/allarticles/surveillance/2433-iasr/related-articles/related-articles-462/8235-462r07.html
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-01-04 18:37:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-04 04:33:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-04 03:27:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-04 03:13:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-04 01:17:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-04 00:00:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-03 23:58:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-03 23:50:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-03 23:48:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-05 05:49:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-05 04:19:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-05 01:39:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-04 10:56:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-04 09:48:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-04 09:01:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-04 04:17:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-04 03:33:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-04 01:56:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-04 01:48:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-04 01:37:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-04 01:27:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-04 00:44:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-04 00:39:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-04 00:34:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-04 00:16:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-05 09:38:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-04 20:12:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-04 08:08:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-04 06:24:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-04 04:32:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-04 03:41:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-04 03:41:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-04 03:04:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-04 01:26:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-03 23:51:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-03 23:51:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-03 23:40:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-03 23:30:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-03 23:28:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-03 23:20:34 -0600 | Rating Details |