Birdwatch Note
2025-01-03 13:07:22 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Financial analyst David Martin's assertions have garnered attention, but they are not supported by any credible scientific evidence and have been repeatedly debunked by experts in the field: https://science.feedback.org/reviewed-content-author/david-martin/ https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN2AM0SF/ https://www.factcheck.org/2023/06/video-distorts-early-coronavirus-research-to-promote-baseless-bioweapon-conspiracy-theory/ https://factcheck.afp.com/new-plandemic-film-promotes-coronavirus-conspiracy-theory https://www.factcheck.org/a-guide-to-our-coronavirus-coverage/ COVID-19 Conspiracist: https://uscnpm.org/2023/05/25/popular-in-china-david-martins-covid-misinformation/
Written by 8E0782E7F593AE43DE132F9A686B9623FE5078AF96C0655960B8BBFA4E740320
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1874924669922603188
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1875167068133204391
- noteId - 1875167068133204391
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 8E0782E7F593AE43DE132F9A686B9623FE5078AF96C0655960B8BBFA4E740320 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1735909642619
- tweetId - 1874924669922603188
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Financial analyst David Martin's assertions have garnered attention, but they are not supported by any credible scientific evidence and have been repeatedly debunked by experts in the field: https://science.feedback.org/reviewed-content-author/david-martin/ https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN2AM0SF/ https://www.factcheck.org/2023/06/video-distorts-early-coronavirus-research-to-promote-baseless-bioweapon-conspiracy-theory/ https://factcheck.afp.com/new-plandemic-film-promotes-coronavirus-conspiracy-theory https://www.factcheck.org/a-guide-to-our-coronavirus-coverage/ COVID-19 Conspiracist: https://uscnpm.org/2023/05/25/popular-in-china-david-martins-covid-misinformation/
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-01-03 09:08:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-03 11:52:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-03 07:42:35 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-03 08:43:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 18:57:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-03 13:54:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-03 08:01:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-03 13:15:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-03 10:03:16 -0600 | Rating Details |